One of the challenges facing the Water sector in rural areas in Uganda is the non-functionality of hand pumps due unaffordable hand pump spare parts and limited financial base for paying the hand pump mechanics (HPM) and hence a major hindrance in the access to safe and clean water.
Rural poverty, although not homogeneous, is deep and widespread. The widely cited “dollar-a-day” poverty measure conceals the fact that individuals in many rural Ugandan households handle cash sums much smaller than a dollar. Households and communities where income-generating opportunities are very limited simply cannot pay the tariffs required for hand pump operation and maintenance (O&M). Cash which is always scarce is used for very essential commodities like food and shelter but not for water which traditionally has always been seen as a “God given gift” to humanity to be enjoyed naturally by everyone, freely!
However, despite this fact, actually, many communities, with some kind of sensitization can willingly pay for water since it has become a more and more scarce commodity. Demand is often viewed as a key indicator for financial sustainability i.e. willingness-to-pay, however experience now shows that ability-to-pay may be the next best indicator, more important than willingness-to-pay.
Associated to the above challenge is that water from boreholes and other sources has been traditionally used for domestic use and not for other income generating activities like farming or brick making. If communities are educated on other multiple uses of water then communities would raise their financial capacities and be able to maintain their water sources to be able to access water-all- year round to sustain their livelihoods in more than just this one tradition way.
The greater challenge though has been associated with the management of the (daily/monthly) user fee and the capital contribution (Ug Shs 200,000) required for every community to receive a borehole from either Government or NGO. Some communities have been advised to deposit that money into a commercial bank to wait for any breakdown of their water source and be able to repair it. While others have been advised to surrender the money to the district water offices to create a pool at that level, other have retained their money and creatively turned it into a community revolving fund whereby members borrow this money and return it with interest. However, when the capital sum grows too big, with multiple borrowers the matter becomes too complex for an ordinary community member who was elected as a treasurer and custodian of the funds. This therefore, calls for greater training not only in financial management and records keeping but also on banking.
If communities could be advised and educated on the concept of Village Savings and Loans Associations (VSLAs) and to invest in commercial ventures like market gardening or brick making their collections and contributions and finding multiple uses of the now-available water sources in their community, they would benefit better and increase their financial power to maintain their families and water sources. For example, they would be able to produce vegetables for the ever- growing markets and populations throughout the year. They would be able to fetch even higher incomes during dry seasons because of the availability of water. This would be one sure way of pulling our communities out of the nagging poverty using the available water sources for rural development.
2 thoughts on “Promising solutions for Operations and Maintenance in rural Uganda”
Thank you for this article.
The fact is that sometimes even the initial UGX 200,000 would be small to borrow and yet keep up some in the safe. We know that many communities have always cultivated in wetlands and generated huge sums of money during dry season. this is trying to use the moisture present in the streams/wetland. For me , the WSSC would simultenously be encouraged to utilise this water to generate income through the watering of high valued food crops that could be sold to supermarkets.
The use of voluntarism is not expected to continue working for long and so as a way to motivate the Water committees, using this water to generate incomes would motivate them to keep the water source functional. The income generated would be shared at 50-50% to be saved in the user fees account and the rest goes to the WSSC members.
The case you have shared show the increasing need to commercialise and professionalise rural water management in East Africa region. We need to ensure that we invest in high value water sources that not only provide drinking water but water for multiple uses to ensure that communities do income generating activities around the water to generate money and contribute meaningfull to operation and maintenance fees for water points. Day are gone where we expect small household O & M fees to sustain the rural water services delivery. We now need to ensure that meaningful contributions are made by the users themselves to contribute to continued water sevices delivery.
Comments are closed.